You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
499 lines
19 KiB
499 lines
19 KiB
.. _release_process: |
|
|
|
Release Process |
|
############### |
|
|
|
The Zephyr project releases on a time-based cycle, rather than a feature-driven |
|
one. Zephyr releases represent an aggregation of the work of many contributors, |
|
companies, and individuals from the community. |
|
|
|
A time-based release process enables the Zephyr project to provide users with a |
|
balance of the latest technologies and features and excellent overall quality. A |
|
roughly 4-month release cycle allows the project to coordinate development of |
|
the features that have actually been implemented, allowing the project to |
|
maintain the quality of the overall release without delays because of one or two |
|
features that are not ready yet. |
|
|
|
The Zephyr release model was loosely based on the Linux kernel model: |
|
|
|
- Release tagging procedure: |
|
|
|
- linear mode on main branch, |
|
- release branches for maintenance after release tagging. |
|
- Each release period will consist of a development phase followed by a |
|
stabilization phase. Release candidates will be tagged during the |
|
stabilization phase. During the stabilization phase, only stabilization |
|
changes such as bug fixes and documentation will be merged unless granted a |
|
special exemption by the Technical Steering Committee. |
|
|
|
- Development phase: all changes are considered and merged, subject to |
|
approval from the respective maintainers. |
|
- Stabilisation phase: the release manager creates a vN-rc1 tag and the tree |
|
enters the stabilization phase |
|
- CI sees the tag, builds and runs tests; Test teams analyse the report from the |
|
build and test run and give an ACK/NAK to the build |
|
- The release owner, with test teams and any other needed input, determines if the |
|
release candidate is a go for release |
|
- If it is a go for a release, the release owner lays a tag release vN at the |
|
same point |
|
|
|
.. figure:: release_cycle.svg |
|
:align: center |
|
:alt: Release Cycle |
|
:figclass: align-center |
|
:width: 80% |
|
|
|
Release Cycle |
|
|
|
.. note:: |
|
|
|
The milestones for the current major version can be found on the |
|
`Official GitHub Wiki <https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/wiki/Release-Management>`_. |
|
Information on previous releases can be found :ref:`here <zephyr_release_notes>`. |
|
|
|
Development Phase |
|
***************** |
|
|
|
A relatively straightforward discipline is followed with regard to the merging |
|
of patches for each release. At the beginning of each development cycle, the |
|
main branch is said to be open for development. At that time, code which is deemed to be |
|
sufficiently stable (and which is accepted by the maintainers and the wide community) is |
|
merged into the mainline tree. The bulk of changes for a new development cycle |
|
(and all of the major changes) will be merged during this time. |
|
|
|
The development phase lasts for approximately three months. At the end of this time, |
|
the release owner will declare that the development phase is over and releases the first |
|
of the release candidates. For the codebase release which is destined to be |
|
3.1.0, for example, the release which happens at the end of the development phase |
|
will be called 3.1.0-rc1. The -rc1 release is the signal that the time to merge |
|
new features has passed, and that the time to stabilize the next release of the |
|
code base has begun. |
|
|
|
Stabilization Phase |
|
******************* |
|
|
|
Over the next weeks and depending on the release milestone, only stabilization, |
|
cosmetic changes, tests, bug and doc fixes are allowed (See :ref:`table |
|
<release_milestones>` below). |
|
|
|
On occasion, more significant changes and new features will be allowed, but such |
|
occasions are rare and require a TSC approval and a justification. As a general |
|
rule, if you miss submitting your code during the development phase for a given |
|
feature, the best thing to do is to wait for the next development cycle. (An |
|
occasional exception is made for drivers for previously unsupported hardware; if |
|
they do not touch any other in-tree code, they cannot cause regressions and |
|
should be safe to add at any time). |
|
|
|
As fixes make their way into the mainline, the patch rate will slow over time. |
|
The mainline release owner releases new -rc drops once or twice a week; a normal |
|
series will get up to somewhere between -rc4 and -rc6 before the code base is |
|
considered to be sufficiently stable and the release criteria have been achieved |
|
at which point the final 3.1.0 release is made. |
|
|
|
At that point, the whole process starts over again. |
|
|
|
.. _release_quality_criteria: |
|
|
|
Release Criteria |
|
**************** |
|
|
|
The main motivation is to clearly have the criteria in place that must be met |
|
for a release. This will help define when a release is "done" in terms that most |
|
people can understand and in ways that help new people to understand the process |
|
and participate in creating successful releases: |
|
|
|
- The release criteria documents all the requirements of our target audience for |
|
each Zephyr release |
|
- The target audiences for each release can be different, and may overlap |
|
- The criteria at any given time are not set in stone: there may be requirements |
|
that have been overlooked, or that are new, and in these cases, the criteria |
|
should be expanded to ensure all needs are covered. |
|
|
|
Below is the high level criteria to be met for each release: |
|
|
|
- No blocker bugs / blocking issues |
|
- All relevant tests shall pass on ``Tier 0`` platforms |
|
- All relevant tests shall pass on Tier 0 and 1 platforms (at least 1 per |
|
architecture/architecture variant/Hardware features) |
|
- All applicable samples/tests shall build on Tiers 0, 1 and 2 |
|
- All high and critical static analysis and security issues addressed |
|
- Release Notes are up-to-date. |
|
|
|
Blocker Bugs |
|
============ |
|
|
|
Blocker bug process kicks in during the release process and is in effect after the |
|
feature freeze milestone. An issue labeled as a blocker practically blocks a |
|
release from happening. All blocker bugs shall be resolved before a release is |
|
created. |
|
|
|
A fix for a bug that is granted ``blocker`` status can be merged to 'main' and included in |
|
the release all the way until the final release date. |
|
|
|
Bugs of moderate severity and higher that have impact on all users are typically |
|
the candidates to be promoted to blocker bugs |
|
|
|
Contributors and member of the release engineering team shall follow these |
|
guidelines for release blocker bugs: |
|
|
|
- Only mark bugs as blockers if the software (Zephyr) must not be released with |
|
the bug present. |
|
- All collaborators can add or remove blocking labels. |
|
- Evaluate bugs as potential blockers based on their severity and prevalence. |
|
- Provide detailed rationale whenever adding or removing a blocking label. |
|
- Ensure all blockers have the milestone tagged. |
|
- Release managers have final say on blocking status; contact them with any questions. |
|
|
|
|
|
.. _release_milestones: |
|
|
|
Release Milestones |
|
******************* |
|
|
|
|
|
.. list-table:: Release Milestones |
|
:widths: 15 25 100 25 |
|
:header-rows: 1 |
|
|
|
* - Timeline |
|
- Checkpoint |
|
- Description |
|
- Owner |
|
* - T-5M |
|
- Planning |
|
- Finalize dates for release, Assign release owner and agree on project wide goals for this release. |
|
- TSC |
|
* - T-7W |
|
- Review target milestones |
|
- Finalize target milestones for features in flight. |
|
- Release Engineering |
|
* - T-4W |
|
- Release Announcement |
|
- Release owner announces feature freeze and timeline for release. |
|
- Release Manager |
|
* - T-3W |
|
- Feature Freeze (RC1) |
|
- No new features after RC1, ONLY stabilization and cosmetic changes, bug and doc |
|
fixes are allowed. New tests for existing features are also allowed. |
|
- Release Engineering |
|
* - T-2W |
|
- 2nd Release Candidate |
|
- No new features after RC2, ONLY stabilization and cosmetic changes, bug and doc fixes are allowed. |
|
- Release Manager |
|
* - T-1W |
|
- Hard Freeze (RC3) |
|
- Only blocker bug fixes after RC3, documentation and changes to release notes are allowed. |
|
Release notes need to be complete by this checkpoint. Release Criteria is |
|
met. |
|
- Release Manager |
|
* - T-0W |
|
- Release |
|
- |
|
- Release Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
Releases |
|
********* |
|
|
|
The following syntax should be used for releases and tags in Git: |
|
|
|
- Release [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level] |
|
- Release Candidate [Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number] |
|
- Tagging: |
|
|
|
- v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level]-rc[RC Number] |
|
- v[Major].[Minor].[Patch Level] |
|
- v[Major].[Minor].99 - A tag applied to main branch to signify that work on |
|
v[Major].[Minor+1] has started. For example, v1.7.99 will be tagged at the |
|
start of v1.8 process. The tag corresponds to |
|
VERSION_MAJOR/VERSION_MINOR/PATCHLEVEL macros as defined for a |
|
work-in-progress main branch version. Presence of this tag allows generation of |
|
sensible output for "git describe" on main branch, as typically used for |
|
automated builds and CI tools. |
|
|
|
|
|
.. figure:: release_flow.png |
|
:align: center |
|
:alt: Releases |
|
:figclass: align-center |
|
:width: 80% |
|
|
|
Zephyr Code and Releases |
|
|
|
.. _release_process_lts: |
|
|
|
Long Term Support (LTS) |
|
======================= |
|
|
|
Long-term support releases are designed to be supported and maintained |
|
for an extended period and is the recommended release for |
|
products and the auditable branch used for certification. |
|
|
|
An LTS release is defined as: |
|
|
|
- **Product focused** |
|
- **Extended Stabilisation period**: Allow for more testing and bug fixing |
|
- **Stable APIs** |
|
- **Quality Driven Process** |
|
- **Long Term**: Maintained for an extended period of time (at least 2.5 years) |
|
overlapping previous LTS release for at least half a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
Product Focused |
|
+++++++++++++++ |
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS is the recommended release for product makers with an extended |
|
support and maintenance which includes general stability and bug fixes, |
|
security fixes. |
|
|
|
An LTS includes both mature and new features. API and feature maturity is |
|
documented and tracked. The footprint and scope of mature and stable APIs expands |
|
as we move from one LTS to the next giving users access to bleeding edge features |
|
and new hardware while keeping a stable foundation that evolves over time. |
|
|
|
Extended Stabilisation Period |
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS development cycle differs from regular releases and has an extended |
|
stabilization period. Feature freeze of regular releases happens 3-4 weeks |
|
before the scheduled release date. The stabilization period for LTS is extended |
|
by 3 weeks with the feature freeze occurring 6-7 weeks before the anticipated |
|
release date. The time between code freeze and release date is extended in this case. |
|
|
|
Stable APIs |
|
+++++++++++ |
|
|
|
Zephyr LTS provides a stable and long-lived foundation for developing |
|
products. To guarantee stability of the APIs and the implementation of such |
|
APIs it is required that any release software that makes the core of the OS |
|
went through the Zephyr API lifecycle and stabilized over at least 2 releases. |
|
This guarantees that we release many of the highlighted and core features with |
|
mature and well-established implementations with stable APIs that are |
|
supported during the lifetime of the release LTS. |
|
|
|
- API Freeze (LTS - 2) |
|
|
|
- All stable APIs need to be frozen 2 releases before an LTS. APIs can be extended |
|
with additional features, but the core implementation is not modified. This |
|
is valid for the following subsystems for example: |
|
|
|
- Device Drivers (i2c.h, spi.h)... |
|
- Kernel (k_*): |
|
- OS services (logging,debugging, ..) |
|
- DTS: API and bindings stability |
|
- Kconfig |
|
|
|
- New APIs for experimental features can be added at any time as long as they |
|
are standalone and documented as experimental or unstable features/APIs. |
|
- Feature Freeze (LTS - 1) |
|
- No new features or overhaul/restructuring of code covering major LTS features. |
|
|
|
- Kernel + Base OS |
|
- Additional advertised LTS features |
|
|
|
- Auxiliary features on top of and/or extending the base OS and advertised LTS features |
|
can be added at any time and should be marked as experimental if applicable |
|
|
|
Quality Driven Process |
|
++++++++++++++++++++++ |
|
|
|
The Zephyr project follows industry standards and processes with the goal of |
|
providing a quality oriented releases. This is achieved by providing the |
|
following products to track progress, integrity and quality of the software |
|
components provided by the project: |
|
|
|
- Compliance with published coding guidelines, style guides and naming |
|
conventions and documentation of deviations. |
|
- Static analysis reports |
|
|
|
- Regular static analysis on the complete tree using available commercial and |
|
open-source tools, and documentation of deviations and false positives. |
|
|
|
- Documented components and APIS |
|
- Requirements Catalog |
|
- Verification Plans |
|
- Verification Reports |
|
- Coverage Reports |
|
- Requirements Traceability Matrix (RTM) |
|
- SPDX License Reports |
|
|
|
Each release is created with the above products to document the quality and the |
|
state of the software when it was released. |
|
|
|
Long Term Support and Maintenance |
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ |
|
|
|
A Zephyr LTS release is published every 2 years and is branched and maintained |
|
independently from the main tree for at least 2.5 years after it was |
|
released. Support and maintenance for an LTS release stops at least half a year |
|
after the following LTS release is published. |
|
|
|
.. figure:: lts.svg |
|
:align: center |
|
:alt: Long Term Support Release |
|
:figclass: align-center |
|
:width: 80% |
|
|
|
Long Term Support Release |
|
|
|
Changes and fixes flow in both directions. However, changes from main branch to an |
|
LTS branch will be limited to fixes that apply to both branches and for existing |
|
features only. |
|
|
|
All fixes for an LTS branch that apply to the mainline tree shall be submitted to |
|
mainline tree as well. |
|
|
|
Auditable Code Base |
|
=================== |
|
|
|
An auditable code base is to be established from a defined subset of Zephyr OS |
|
features and will be limited in scope. The LTS, development tree, and the |
|
auditable code bases shall be kept in sync after the audit branch is created, |
|
but with a more rigorous process in place for adding new features into the audit |
|
branch used for certification. |
|
|
|
This process will be applied before new features move into the |
|
auditable code base. |
|
|
|
The initial and subsequent certification targets will be decided by the Zephyr project |
|
governing board. |
|
|
|
Processes to achieve selected certification will be determined by the Security and |
|
Safety Working Groups and coordinated with the TSC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware Support Tiers |
|
*********************** |
|
|
|
Tier 0: Emulation Platforms |
|
=========================== |
|
|
|
- Tests are both built and run in these platforms in CI, and therefore runtime |
|
failures can block Pull Requests. |
|
- Supported by the Zephyr project itself, commitment to fix bugs in releases. |
|
- One Tier 0 platform is required for each new architecture. |
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are to be evaluated and treated as |
|
a general bug in Zephyr and should be dealt with the highest priority. |
|
|
|
Tier 1: Supported Platforms |
|
=========================== |
|
|
|
- Commitment from a specific team to run tests using twister device |
|
testing for the "Zephyr compatibility test suite" (details TBD) |
|
on a regular basis using open-source and publicly available drivers. |
|
- Commitment to fix bugs in time for releases. Not supported by "Zephyr Project" |
|
itself. |
|
- General availability for purchase |
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are to be evaluated and treated |
|
as a general bug in Zephyr and should be dealt with medium to high priority. |
|
|
|
Tier 2: Community Platforms |
|
=========================== |
|
|
|
- Platform implementation is available in upstream, no commitment to testing, |
|
may not be generally available. |
|
- Has a dedicated maintainer who commits to respond to issues / review patches. |
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are NOT considered as |
|
a general bug in Zephyr. |
|
|
|
Tier 3: Deprecated and unsupported Platforms |
|
============================================ |
|
|
|
- Platform implementation is available, but no owner or unresponsive owner. |
|
- No commitment to support is available. |
|
- May be removed from upstream if no one works to bring it up to tier 2 or better. |
|
- Bugs reported against platforms of this tier are NOT considered as |
|
a general bug in Zephyr. |
|
|
|
|
|
Release Procedure |
|
****************** |
|
|
|
This section documents the Release manager responsibilities so that it serves as |
|
a knowledge repository for Release managers. |
|
|
|
Release Checklist |
|
================= |
|
|
|
Each release has a GitHub issue associated with it that contains the full |
|
checklist. After a release is complete, a checklist for the next release is |
|
created. |
|
|
|
Tagging |
|
======= |
|
|
|
The final release and each release candidate shall be tagged using the following |
|
steps: |
|
|
|
.. note:: |
|
|
|
Tagging needs to be done via explicit git commands and not via GitHub's release |
|
interface. The GitHub release interface does not generate annotated tags (it |
|
generates 'lightweight' tags regardless of release or pre-release). You should |
|
also upload your gpg public key to your GitHub account, since the instructions |
|
below involve creating signed tags. However, if you do not have a gpg public |
|
key you can opt to remove the ``-s`` option from the commands below. |
|
|
|
.. tabs:: |
|
|
|
.. tab:: Release Candidate |
|
|
|
.. note:: |
|
|
|
This section uses tagging 1.11.0-rc1 as an example, replace with |
|
the appropriate release candidate version. |
|
|
|
#. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file |
|
located in the root of the Git repository to match the version for |
|
this release candidate. The ``EXTRAVERSION`` variable is used to |
|
identify the rc[RC Number] value for this candidate:: |
|
|
|
EXTRAVERSION = rc1 |
|
|
|
#. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using |
|
``release: Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1`` as the commit subject. Merge |
|
the PR after successful CI. |
|
#. Tag and push the version, using an annotated tag:: |
|
|
|
$ git pull |
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0-rc1" v1.11.0-rc1 |
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0-rc1 |
|
|
|
#. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``) |
|
with a link to the release |
|
|
|
.. tab:: Final Release |
|
|
|
.. note:: |
|
|
|
This section uses tagging 1.11.0 as an example, replace with the |
|
appropriate final release version. |
|
|
|
When all final release criteria has been met and the final release notes |
|
have been approved and merged into the repository, the final release version |
|
will be set and repository tagged using the following procedure: |
|
|
|
#. Update the version variables in the :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file |
|
located in the root of the Git repository. Set ``EXTRAVERSION`` |
|
variable to an empty string to indicate final release:: |
|
|
|
EXTRAVERSION = |
|
|
|
#. Post a PR with the updated :zephyr_file:`VERSION` file using |
|
``release: Zephyr 1.11.0`` as the commit subject. Merge |
|
the PR after successful CI. |
|
#. Tag and push the version, using two annotated tags:: |
|
|
|
$ git pull |
|
$ git tag -s -m "Zephyr 1.11.0" v1.11.0 |
|
$ git push git@github.com:zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr.git v1.11.0 |
|
|
|
#. Find the new ``v1.11.0`` tag at the top of the releases page and |
|
edit the release with the ``Edit tag`` button with the following: |
|
|
|
* Copy the overview of ``docs/releases/release-notes-1.11.rst`` |
|
into the release notes textbox and link to the full release notes |
|
file on docs.zephyrproject.org. |
|
|
|
#. Send an email to the mailing lists (``announce`` and ``devel``) with a link |
|
to the release
|
|
|